# Rethinking contract deployment

**URL:** <https://forum.aztec.network/t/rethinking-contract-deployment/3862>\
**Category:** Aztec\
**Created:** [February 5, 2024, 12:55pm UTC](https://forum.aztec.network/t/rethinking-contract-deployment/3862 "2024-02-05T12:55:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lezuko](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.aztec.network/lezuko/32/1909_2.png) [@Lezuko](https://forum.aztec.network/u/Lezuko)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2024, 3:38pm UTC](https://forum.aztec.network/t/rethinking-contract-deployment/3862/2 "2024-02-14T15:38:05Z")

</div>

@ [spalladino](https://forum.aztec.network/u/spalladino)  
Thank you, this article is very useful, especially for those who want to better understand how the Aztec protocol works

@Sanemi I know you were looking for something like that 😊

and I think this will be interesting for you

> [@\[Proposal\] Contract Deployment](https://forum.aztec.network/t/proposal-contract-deployment/48):
>
> See [here](https://hackmd.io/IDd5U7BJRAil-XoNb4uZQA) for the latest contract creation proposal from Zac. Just opening up a discussion thread on this topic.

especially this one

> Blockquote From the hackmd:

The first reply

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.aztec.network/t/rethinking-contract-deployment/3862)._