# Request for Proposals: Upgrade Mechanisms

**URL:** <https://forum.aztec.network/t/request-for-proposals-upgrade-mechanisms/605>\
**Category:** Aztec\
**Tags:** rfp, upgrades\
**Created:** [June 20, 2023, 5:14pm UTC](https://forum.aztec.network/t/request-for-proposals-upgrade-mechanisms/605 "2023-06-20T17:14:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cooper-aztecLabs](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.aztec.network/cooper-azteclabs/32/130_2.png) [@cooper-aztecLabs](https://forum.aztec.network/u/cooper-aztecLabs)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2023, 4:25pm UTC](https://forum.aztec.network/t/request-for-proposals-upgrade-mechanisms/605/3 "2023-06-21T16:25:24Z")

</div>

> [@\[Upgrade proposal\] - Non-govnernance via social consensus](http://forum.aztec.network/t/upgrade-proposal-non-govnernance-via-social-consensus/611):
>
> tldr; use social consensus & end up migrating everything! Summary This proposal suggests a simple approach to Aztec’s governance and upgrade mechanism - focusing on making everything non-upgradable, and therefore dubbed “non-governance” or “anarchy” (perhaps we can come up with a better name, or just call it social consensus?). Instead of having a system of governance that could potentially be co-opted by a few key stakeholders, such as the largest token holders or infrastructure providers, we…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.aztec.network/t/request-for-proposals-upgrade-mechanisms/605)._